Monday, 4 April 2011

Should government legalize marijuana?

Hello,

I was recently watching the national debate about the new drugs laws that are about to be introduced in Poland.

The new law was passed, stating that a person won’t be panelized for having minor amounts of drugs in his possession for his personal use. That basically means that “drug users” will be able to walk around with common drugs like marijuana, cocaine, amphetamine etc as long as it’s for non distribution personal uses.

The new law has its followers as well as opponents, therefore I would like to give a presentation and hear your thoughts on soft drugs, like marijuana, legalization.

What is marijuana?

Marijuana is the most widely used holistic drug on the planet. To many, it’s an evil weed to some it’s a secret herb while to others it’s a life saver.

Marijuana is a psychoactive plant commonly known as cannabis, grass, pot or weed. Its estimated that marijuana is used by more than 167 mln people worldwide.

Major psychoactive chemical compound in cannabis is 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (commonly abbreviated as THC). Cannabis contains more than 400 different chemical compounds known as cannabinoids.

Cannabis usage has been found to have occurred as long ago as the 3rd millennium BC. In modern times, the drug has been used for recreational, religious or spiritual, and medicinal purposes.

So why was Marijuana made illegal?

In 1970 the US federal government passed the control substance act classifying marijuana as a schedule one drug, just like heroin. This basically means that it has a high potential for abuse with no medical values.

The two below clips in my opinion well explain the political and financial reasons so as to why marijuana was made illegal.

Short clip from California legalization campaign




as well as a Joe Rogan state on the matter




I encourage you to comment on the above.

Do you believe that it was just for this reasons (political and financial) that marijuana was made illegal?

Does hemp has any medical values?

Currently in the US there are fourteen states that allow patients to smoke, grow and purchase marijuana on a doctor’s recommendation.

As I mentioned before cannabis has more than 400 different chemical compounds known as cannabinoids . The most commonly known cannabinoid is called THC.

When ingested the compounds attach themselves to cannabinoid receptors (yes, indeed, human bodies have developed cannabinoids receptors in their nervous system). Those compounds parts of the brain responsible for memory, anxiety, appetite, coordination and pain.

At the moment in the US marijuana is prescribed to patients suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic illness as well as for those who fight depression and anxiety.

Below there is a very interesting and moving short clip explaining how marijuana helps patients in their battle for life.




Currently in the US the use of marijuana for patients is legal, but some say that the system is abused by recreational users who exploit medical endorsement to bypass the law.

Do you believe that marijuana has health benefits?

Should marijuana be available to patients with the doctor’s prescription?

Please watch also a short videos and comment it




Can we compare marijuana to Beer? Does it have the same effect as alcohol?

Why officials treat alcohol and marijuana in a different way?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdQ-87OrTtY&feature=related

If illegal marijuana is so commonly accessible should it not be legalized?

Saturday, 2 April 2011

The Universe as Electric Conductor Part III

The Electric Universe model is usually developed by the employment of the plasma cosmology. The plasma cosmology is achieved through the institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. There are various refereed documents on the topic of plasma cosmology on Plasma science that is published in the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
foto: http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQqpyuLiACSs2KK0BmfOWhaLonGN4yIGh71b9hQaMrygd9xe2Kjow&t=1

This particular journal was discussed and was found that the reminiscent of this particular journal is similar to those journals that are more than one hundred years old. There is a paper on the electrical nature of supernovas and stars, that was published in the year 2007, which explains various facts such as the astronomers plot brightness and stellar color. 

Do you know how supernova originates?


This journal involves the Hezsprung-Rusell diagram where the left and right are reversed. This makes it difficult for an individual to see the connection that exists between the electrical power that arrives at the star and the color, brightness and size of that particular star. The plasma cosmology is not similar to the big bang cosmology because plasma cosmology involves several experimental tests that are normally done in the laboratory.

The plasma cosmology also takes into consideration the Lichtenberg experimental tradition. The bangs that the plasma cosmology makes are usually noisy and real. This particular cosmology can show the electrical formation and how the stars and the spiral galaxies behave. This is usually done without the recourse to black holes and other dark matter.


Unlike the electronic universe model, the visible universe consists of a gas known as plasma. In this gas, there are various atoms that have lost one or two electrons. This particular gas is not similar to the gases that we experience here on earth. This gas is a better conductor when compared to copper and it strongly reacts when it is in the presence of electromagnetic fields.

This gas has an extraordinary behavior, which is complex as compared to the gases that we experience here in earth. This implies that the electrical universe model is composed of an electrical plasma phenomenon. The presence of electricity is evident in space and the presence of magnetic fields in space is generated by the presence of electric currents. 

However the question is where does the current come from? 
Are we just an experiment of some superior race? 
How do you think ?

Scientists use the radio telescopes, which continuously detect magnetic fields, and these field configurations usually match those that have been found in the experiments conducted on plasma cosmology. Eric Lerner, a plasma cosmologist stated that one of the most destructive characteristics of the big bang methodology is the fact that it conveys that only individuals versed in completely hard mathematics can understand the electric universe model.


The Bible and the Electric universe model usually have certain similarities that cannot be ignored. There are several conclusions of this particular model that do not differ a lot with those of the Bible. 


Do you find it interesting, irrelevant or maybe terrifying ?


These conclusions include the Biblical model, which does not accept certain models such as the big bang model. The big bang model is not accepted by this particular model when it comes to the fact that the big bang model is the one that usually keeps track of physics and astronomy.
foto: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/king_james_bible7.jpg

The big bang model considers itself as the one that controls astronomy with the origins program, which was developed by NASA. This particular model repudiates the thousands and millions of distance that is counted in light years stated by the media in a daily basis.

foto: http://p21chong.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/the-burning-bush.jpg?w=400&h=300

The Biblical model usually dismisses the big bang model and says that the big bang model did not exist at all. This particular model usually states that the size of the visible universe is smaller. It states the visible universe is not as big as people think or say. It states that people do not know the size of the universe and also states that there is evidence that shows the existence of the stellar evolution.

With this model, there is usually a time scale that is not different from that of the human life. The Biblical model states that the age of the Universe is approximately six thousand years old while the Electric universe model states that there is no person who is capable of stating the age of the stars. 


To be honest is there any way you heard of that would allow such measurement?


The reason why this model suggests so is because the theory of the thermonuclear evolution does not state the age of the stars. This implies that there is no individual who has the ability to know the age of the stars and the universe.
There are high possibilities that the agreement that exists between these two models (the Biblical model and the Electric universe model) is going to be transparent when it comes to information about the universe. This will bring joy to the Biblical and Electric universe model believers and on the other hand it will bring sadness to the believers of other models such as the big bang model.
The discoveries of the Electronic universe model usually consist of various scientific systems that help individuals to solve certain questions but the questions that are usually solved by this model have been known to pull down the age of the universe.
foto: http://www.electricuniverse.info/File:Lightnings_animation.gif

This implies that there is no time to give the opportunity for evolution to take place. 



Do you believe in the Bible ??



At the end I would like to ask you which side do you take?
Do you agree with me that the new cosmology model is quite intriguing? 

Thursday, 31 March 2011

Photoshop instead of plastic surgery, or how else can we fool the time.

PART 2


I also believe that a very large role in shaping the canons of beauty play computer graphic artists who are often under the influence of inspiration; there is so embellished figure on the cover that often at "first glance we do not know who it is.


Here I would like to show the campaign's billboard dove, which was not only barred, as a promotional campaign, but even it got a negative publicity.



Magazine covers, present us with perfect women and men. Beautifully-looking aging grandmother, full of vigor parent ‘s of children.

Leaders are skinny models with sunken cheeks, showing excellent matching clothes, like the store hangers. What is the truth about this? I think not one of us has had time to find out.


Referring here to the plastic surgery, you may consider such non-surgical treatments for improving appearance. The whole procedure is very similar, improving, learning, reduction, slimming, zooming, smoothing.


Thanks to the Photoshop, you can get a really great effect, without leaving home, without spending a fortune without any effort.


Promoting this type of behavior has irreversible consequences: young girls and boys are becoming victims of anorexia, the quest for excellence.


An example of such irresponsibility of the media, is promoting the program TOP MODEL, where one of the lead with a smile on his lips, boasted how they had slimmed down contestants.


Shouldn’t the designers think of ordinary people? Why do we admire those who promote ill-

behavior?


Don’t you think that the media should be blamed for anorexia?

What can we do about the irresponsible behavior of young girl?