The Electric Universe model is usually developed by the employment of the plasma cosmology. The plasma cosmology is achieved through the institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. There are various refereed documents on the topic of plasma cosmology on Plasma science that is published in the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
foto: http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQqpyuLiACSs2KK0BmfOWhaLonGN4yIGh71b9hQaMrygd9xe2Kjow&t=1
This particular journal was discussed and was found that the reminiscent of this particular journal is similar to those journals that are more than one hundred years old. There is a paper on the electrical nature of supernovas and stars, that was published in the year 2007, which explains various facts such as the astronomers plot brightness and stellar color.
Do you know how supernova originates?
This journal involves the Hezsprung-Rusell diagram where the left and right are reversed. This makes it difficult for an individual to see the connection that exists between the electrical power that arrives at the star and the color, brightness and size of that particular star. The plasma cosmology is not similar to the big bang cosmology because plasma cosmology involves several experimental tests that are normally done in the laboratory.
The plasma cosmology also takes into consideration the Lichtenberg experimental tradition. The bangs that the plasma cosmology makes are usually noisy and real. This particular cosmology can show the electrical formation and how the stars and the spiral galaxies behave. This is usually done without the recourse to black holes and other dark matter.
Unlike the electronic universe model, the visible universe consists of a gas known as plasma. In this gas, there are various atoms that have lost one or two electrons. This particular gas is not similar to the gases that we experience here on earth. This gas is a better conductor when compared to copper and it strongly reacts when it is in the presence of electromagnetic fields.
This gas has an extraordinary behavior, which is complex as compared to the gases that we experience here in earth. This implies that the electrical universe model is composed of an electrical plasma phenomenon. The presence of electricity is evident in space and the presence of magnetic fields in space is generated by the presence of electric currents.
However the question is where does the current come from?
Are we just an experiment of some superior race?
How do you think ?
Scientists use the radio telescopes, which continuously detect magnetic fields, and these field configurations usually match those that have been found in the experiments conducted on plasma cosmology. Eric Lerner, a plasma cosmologist stated that one of the most destructive characteristics of the big bang methodology is the fact that it conveys that only individuals versed in completely hard mathematics can understand the electric universe model.
Do you find it interesting, irrelevant or maybe terrifying ?
These conclusions include the Biblical model, which does not accept certain models such as the big bang model. The big bang model is not accepted by this particular model when it comes to the fact that the big bang model is the one that usually keeps track of physics and astronomy.
foto: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/king_james_bible7.jpg
The big bang model considers itself as the one that controls astronomy with the origins program, which was developed by NASA. This particular model repudiates the thousands and millions of distance that is counted in light years stated by the media in a daily basis.
foto: http://p21chong.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/the-burning-bush.jpg?w=400&h=300
The Biblical model usually dismisses the big bang model and says that the big bang model did not exist at all. This particular model usually states that the size of the visible universe is smaller. It states the visible universe is not as big as people think or say. It states that people do not know the size of the universe and also states that there is evidence that shows the existence of the stellar evolution.
With this model, there is usually a time scale that is not different from that of the human life. The Biblical model states that the age of the Universe is approximately six thousand years old while the Electric universe model states that there is no person who is capable of stating the age of the stars.
To be honest is there any way you heard of that would allow such measurement?
The reason why this model suggests so is because the theory of the thermonuclear evolution does not state the age of the stars. This implies that there is no individual who has the ability to know the age of the stars and the universe.
There are high possibilities that the agreement that exists between these two models (the Biblical model and the Electric universe model) is going to be transparent when it comes to information about the universe. This will bring joy to the Biblical and Electric universe model believers and on the other hand it will bring sadness to the believers of other models such as the big bang model.
The discoveries of the Electronic universe model usually consist of various scientific systems that help individuals to solve certain questions but the questions that are usually solved by this model have been known to pull down the age of the universe.
foto: http://www.electricuniverse.info/File:Lightnings_animation.gif
This implies that there is no time to give the opportunity for evolution to take place.
Do you believe in the Bible ??
At the end I would like to ask you which side do you take?
Do you agree with me that the new cosmology model is quite intriguing?
Supernova originate from dying red supergiant stars. Supernovae are widely used as “standard candles” in cosmology, and observations of type 1a supernovae provided the first evidence that the expansion of the universe was accelerating.
ReplyDeleteThe sources of the current can be multiple. However this answer sounds it can come from an unknown force i.e. God, aliens or it can simply be a result of different mechanisms that govern physics. It is also very probable that it comes from an unknown superior race that is experimenting on us. In my opinion asking such questions is senseless since we will not be able to answer these questions until our knowledge is more advanced or (providing aliens do exist) we are visited by them on earth.
I do not see how this information could be irrelevant to anybody. An information about the origins of the world to a great extent are the origins of human beings which is turn means our own birth. This information is definitely interesting, thought-provoking and at the same time a bit terrifying. When we confirm what happened to the earth million years ago and how it was created we will be able to answer most of “the unknown” answers. Therefore it seems also terrifying since we can find out the truth about us and the universe which can affect our way of living and thinking.
Measuring the age of the stars is almost like trying to count the stars. It is impossible to say how old each star is and when it was born. Any attempts to measure the age of the stars are just approximate estimations. People have been trying for centuries to organize all the knowledge they have however, fortunately there are still things that are undiscovered and unknown. Thanks to this we will have something to strive for.
I partially believe in the Bible and partially in science. I think that the big bang theory should be supported by the Bible. I think that behind the big bang there has to be something hiding. It can mean that it was God who gave the impulse to start the big bang. However it should be clearly said that the Bible itself and its understanding of the creation of the world is not sufficient any longer and is not parallel with what people already know. Therefore I strongly believe that the best method is to combine both science and the Bible.
I do agree that the new cosmology model is quite intriguing however as it is the case with most discoveries and novelties found out by people it takes time to make clear distinction who is for and who is against. It took a long time to convince people 500 years ago that the earth is not flat but that it revolves around the sun. With more time we will be able to judge if the new cosmology model can be accepted and if we can build our future upon this discovery.
When it comes to the side I would like to underline that in my opinion balanced point of view is the best i.e. if we combine what we know from the Bible with the newest science we can find out that it does make sense.
OMG. Such a hard lecture. Your argument about 6 thousand year old universe is invalid, please educate. For example bones of dinosaurs are older then 6 thousands years old (like 150mln years old). If you undermine the way of determining the age of it - please educate. (I could explain how but I don't see the point).
ReplyDeleteIt's very hard to choose one side. Biblical theory has one good point, which still can't take by scientists: what started this big bang? Scientists have some rights too, because Bible doesn't explain dinosaurs, whole universe and evolution. Maybe humanity still needs new proofs and another thusands years to explain this and create one truly model of the universe.
ReplyDelete